Two sessions writing to the same potfile
#4
(04-06-2018, 08:29 AM)CUwindows00 Wrote: Hello everyone

Ask a question of hashcat rules
Why do not many combination rules have such a rule?

Swap location attack rule
For example:

cat 1.txt 
abc

cat 2.txt
123

cat 3.txt
!@#$

I think this rule is advanced and effective.

Hashcat does not have such a rule

The 3 combination attack rule generation should be the result of the following dictionary

abcabcabc
abcabc123
abcabc!@#$
abc123abc
abc123123
abc123!@#$
abc!@#$abc
abc!@#$123
abc!@#$!@#$
123abcabc
123abc123
123abc!@#$
123123abc
123123123
123123!@#$
123!@#$abc
123!@#$123
123!@#$!@#$
!@#$abcabc
!@#$abc123
!@#$abc!@#$
!@#$123abc
!@#$123123
!@#$123!@#$
!@#$!@#$abc
!@#$!@#$123
!@#$!@#$!@#$

Maybe you should consider starting your own thread instead of randomly posting on this one.

I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with file locks.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Why do not many combination rules have such a rule? - by devilsadvocate - 04-06-2018, 08:41 AM