Mask error?
#5
excellent find. i can confirm its a bug. i was able to reproduce this locally and i have already fixed it.

it occours in -a 6 when the base word side is < length 8, because oclhashcat-plus rejects them since in WPA the plain must be at least of length 8. Of course this is a bug, because it has to add the length of the modifier side. you can see this here:

Quote:Progress.....: 67600/67600 (100.00%)
Rejected.....: 67600/67600 (100.00%)

Thanks again for reporting!

here is a quote of the fixed version:

Quote:root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500 Snohomish.hccap dict -a 6 ?l?l?d?d
oclHashcat-plus v0.08 by atom starting...

Hashes: 1
Unique salts: 1
Unique digests: 1
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
GPU-Loops: 128
GPU-Accel: 16
Password lengths range: 8 - 15
Platform: AMD compatible platform found
Watchdog: Temperature limit set to 90c
Device #1: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
Device #2: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
Device #1: Allocating 24MB host-memory
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m2500.Cypress.64.kernel (1655748 bytes)
Device #2: Allocating 24MB host-memory
Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m2500.Cypress.64.kernel (1655748 bytes)

Scanned dictionary dict: 7 bytes, 1 words, 67600 keyspace, starting attack...

Snohomish:panthers77

Status.......: Cracked
Input.Base...: File (dict)
Input.Mod....: Mask (?l?l?d?d)
Hash.Target..: Snohomish (00:1e:e5:55:3c:98 <-> 90:4c:e5:25:81:36)
Hash.Type....: WPA/WPA2
Time.Running.: 1 sec
Time.Util....: 1000.7ms/0.0ms Real/CPU, 0.0% idle
Speed........: 67550 c/s Real, 139.5k c/s GPU
Recovered....: 1/1 Digests, 1/1 Salts
Progress.....: 67600/67600 (100.00%)
Rejected.....: 0/67600 (0.00%)
HW.Monitor.#1: 0% GPU, 44c Temp
HW.Monitor.#2: 0% GPU, 40c Temp

Started: Thu Jan 26 06:08:40 2012
Stopped: Thu Jan 26 06:08:41 2012


Messages In This Thread
Mask error? - by logistix - 01-25-2012, 05:13 PM
RE: Mask error? - by atom - 01-25-2012, 11:27 PM
RE: Mask error? - by logistix - 01-25-2012, 11:40 PM
RE: Mask error? - by logistix - 01-26-2012, 04:48 AM
RE: Mask error? - by atom - 01-26-2012, 07:10 AM
RE: Mask error? - by logistix - 01-26-2012, 10:55 PM