(05-24-2019, 09:37 PM)philsmd Wrote: what are the number of salts and cost factors of the two runs that you are comparing ?
They must be identical to make any conclusions.
$2a$05$
for instance means 2^5 = 32 iterations, but for instance $2a$19$ means 2 ^ 19 = 524288 iterations.
524288 is much more than 32, $2a$19$ is much slower than $2a$05$
the more salts you have, the more combinations there will be each salt must be combined with each password.
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 2048/8192 MB allocatable, 15MCU
* Device #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 2048/8192 MB allocatable, 15MCU
* Device #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 2048/8192 MB allocatable, 15MCU
* Device #4: GeForce GTX 1070, 2048/8192 MB allocatable, 15MCU
* Device #5: GeForce GTX 1070, 2048/8192 MB allocatable, 15MCU
* Device #6: GeForce GTX 1070, 2048/8192 MB allocatable, 15MCU
OpenCL Platform #2: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
* Device #7: Intel(R) HD Graphics 510, skipped.
* Device #8: Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4400 @ 3.30GHz, skipped.
Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable
Hashmode: 0 - MD5
Speed.#1.........: 8788.8 MH/s (26.70ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4
Speed.#2.........: 8413.8 MH/s (25.75ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4
Speed.#3.........: 8666.7 MH/s (25.89ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4
Speed.#4.........: 8541.2 MH/s (26.17ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4
Speed.#5.........: 8525.3 MH/s (26.04ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4
Speed.#6.........: 8378.6 MH/s (26.58ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:1024 Vec:4
Speed.#*.........: 51314.4 MH/s
Hashmode: 100 - SHA1
Speed.#1.........: 4111.1 MH/s (76.25ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:2
Speed.#2.........: 4094.1 MH/s (73.74ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:2
Speed.#3.........: 3998.5 MH/s (73.76ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:2
Speed.#4.........: 4146.0 MH/s (75.85ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:2
Speed.#5.........: 4211.0 MH/s (75.05ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:2
Speed.#6.........: 4145.9 MH/s (75.93ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:2
Speed.#*.........: 24706.6 MH/s
Hashmode: 1400 - SHA2-256
Speed.#1.........: 1122.8 MH/s (52.93ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:256 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Speed.#2.........: 1062.5 MH/s (52.32ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:256 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Speed.#3.........: 1093.4 MH/s (51.69ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:256 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Speed.#4.........: 1062.8 MH/s (53.11ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:256 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Speed.#5.........: 1062.7 MH/s (52.52ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:256 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Speed.#6.........: 1188.0 MH/s (52.82ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:256 Thr:1024 Vec:1
Speed.#*.........: 6592.1 MH/s
Hashmode: 1700 - SHA2-512
Speed.#1.........: 333.1 MH/s (50.53ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:64 Thr:640 Vec:1
Speed.#2.........: 313.7 MH/s (49.75ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:64 Thr:640 Vec:1
Speed.#3.........: 323.7 MH/s (49.78ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:64 Thr:640 Vec:1
Speed.#4.........: 324.0 MH/s (51.50ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:64 Thr:640 Vec:1
Speed.#5.........: 320.4 MH/s (51.12ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:64 Thr:640 Vec:1
Speed.#6.........: 333.2 MH/s (50.70ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:64 Thr:640 Vec:1
If you look here you can see what they are supposed to be: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-5440-page-5.html
Its running at almost half the speed of a 1070's benchmarked speed almost everywhere.