05-14-2020, 12:11 PM
No, this is just fine. The iteration count of the hash you are cracking (1024 iterations) is much higher than the iteration count used in the benchmark (32 iterations).
If you do the math: 1024 (iterations of your hash) / 32 (iterations of benchmark hash) = 32 (slow-down of your hash compared to benchmark)
147.2 kH/s (your overall benchmark performance) /32 (slow-down) = ~4600 H/s (pretty much the performance you are seeing)
If you do the math: 1024 (iterations of your hash) / 32 (iterations of benchmark hash) = 32 (slow-down of your hash compared to benchmark)
147.2 kH/s (your overall benchmark performance) /32 (slow-down) = ~4600 H/s (pretty much the performance you are seeing)