Cracking performance lower than expected?
#3
Thanks.
 
The command is as follows:
 
Code:
$ ./hashcat.bin -O -m 11300 -a 0 -w 4 -D 1,2 -S -o bitcoin.cracked bitcoin.hashes **********.txt
 
The dictionary file **********.txt is 21.7 GB.
 
The bitcoin.hashes file has 86 hashes.
 
All the best.
 

Code:
$ ./hashcat.bin --restore hashcat (v6.2.2) starting in restore mode...   CUDA API (CUDA 11.4) ==================== * Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 1971/2001 MB, 5MCU   OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.1 LINUX) - Platform #1 [Intel(R) Corporation] ================================================================== * Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU         980  @ 3.33GHz, 23986/24050 MB (6012 MB allocatable), 12MCU   OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.4.94) - Platform #2 [NVIDIA Corporation] ======================================================================= * Device #3: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti, skipped   Kernel /opt/HashCat/OpenCL/m11300-optimized.cl: Optimized kernel requested, but not available or not required Falling back to pure kernel   Minimum password length supported by kernel: 0 Maximum password length supported by kernel: 256   Hashes: 88 digests; 86 unique digests, 85 unique salts Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates Rules: 1   Optimizers applied: * Zero-Byte * Slow-Hash-SIMD-LOOP * Uses-64-Bit   Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c   Host memory required for this attack: 430 MB   Dictionary cache hit: * Filename..: **********.txt * Passwords.: 1973218843 * Bytes.....: 21744529702 * Keyspace..: 1973218843   [s]tatus [p]ause [b]ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit => s   Session..........: hashcat Status...........: Running Hash.Name........: Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat Hash.Target......: bitcoin.hashes Time.Started.....: Thu Aug  5 15:01:39 2021 (4 hours, 40 mins) Time.Estimated...: Thu Jul 25 15:10:24 2024 (2 years, 354 days) Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel Guess.Base.......: File (**********.txt) Guess.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%) Speed.#1.........:     1590 H/s (319.13ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:128 Thr:1024 Vec:1 Speed.#2.........:      191 H/s (358.86ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:1024 Thr:1 Vec:2 Speed.#*.........:     1781 H/s Recovered........: 0/86 (0.00%) Digests, 0/85 (0.00%) Salts Progress.........: 776404992/167723601655 (0.46%) Rejected.........: 0/776404992 (0.00%) Restore.Point....: 9152512/1973218843 (0.46%) Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:80 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:138240-138368 Restore.Sub.#2...: Salt:13 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:24576-25600 Candidate.Engine.: Host Generator + PCIe Candidates.#1....: syntasswn -> kumpu Candidates.#2....: jondom -> jerry760 Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 68c Fan: 45% Util:100% Core:1150MHz Mem:2700MHz Bus:16 Hardware.Mon.#2..: N/A   [s]tatus [p]ause [b]ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Cracking performance lower than expected? - by MA40 - 08-05-2021, 07:56 PM