Hi!
I want to target only 1 bssid-my AP and not a lot of them(others). If I get standard line I get lots of Rogue PMKID fast what is normal, but the file has too may of PMKIDs(my+others).
If I select as target one AP with specific channel which I got from the scan I dont get it. Is the code allright? I dont want to use old way of handshakes.
Or is it a better way to capture multiple PMKID and what tool do I need to seperate 1 large file with multiple PMKIDs into 1 file 1 PMKID?
If I use enable status 64(tested a little interesting) I get update pretty fast, but what is the difference between PMKID and RoguePMKID? Are both all right or are Rogue from other AP?
When I start cracking the hash I get info digests, unique digests and salts. The name of the essid is often default, so in that case could the hash be cracked even if it says that it is salted? What is the difference between those 3? Normally salted one has extra protection, but I want to know if hashcat takes essid or similar and salted ones can be cracked with no extra methods? I mean captured wireless files - hashes with WPA2 protection.
Thank you that would clarify a lot.
I want to target only 1 bssid-my AP and not a lot of them(others). If I get standard line I get lots of Rogue PMKID fast what is normal, but the file has too may of PMKIDs(my+others).
If I select as target one AP with specific channel which I got from the scan I dont get it. Is the code allright? I dont want to use old way of handshakes.
Code:
hcxdumptool -i wlan1 -o test --filterlist_ap=MAC_adress --filtermode=2 -c 1 --enable_status=64Or is it a better way to capture multiple PMKID and what tool do I need to seperate 1 large file with multiple PMKIDs into 1 file 1 PMKID?
If I use enable status 64(tested a little interesting) I get update pretty fast, but what is the difference between PMKID and RoguePMKID? Are both all right or are Rogue from other AP?
When I start cracking the hash I get info digests, unique digests and salts. The name of the essid is often default, so in that case could the hash be cracked even if it says that it is salted? What is the difference between those 3? Normally salted one has extra protection, but I want to know if hashcat takes essid or similar and salted ones can be cracked with no extra methods? I mean captured wireless files - hashes with WPA2 protection.
Thank you that would clarify a lot.