LM & NTLMv1 + challenge
#6
(01-24-2023, 11:29 AM)jason81 Wrote:
(12-19-2022, 06:57 PM)Chick3nman Wrote: Attacking the LM Challenge Response in NetNTLMv1 is fairly uncommon and thus not implemented in hashcat. I've recently gone back and did a PoC for this exact attack but I've not pushed it to master yet. Seeing that there are others doing this too, I guess I'll have to finish it up and add it as a separate mode.

Do You happen to have any update on this? Smile

It's not currently released, apologies. I try to only release things in a relatively polished state so I've got quite the backlog of half finished stuff. This is also a little further complicated by the ESS/SSP hashes that do not contain a valid LM challenge response. I've not yet decided how to handle those hashes and if I should trust the user to know better or if I should try and parse the hash to reject them in the module parser.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by jason81 - 12-19-2022, 02:53 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by Snoopy - 12-19-2022, 03:09 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by Chick3nman - 12-19-2022, 06:57 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by jason81 - 12-21-2022, 11:32 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by jason81 - 01-24-2023, 11:29 AM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by Chick3nman - 01-24-2023, 05:37 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by jason81 - 03-13-2023, 04:12 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by jason81 - 04-07-2023, 03:17 PM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by Chick3nman - 04-10-2023, 04:12 AM
RE: LM & NTLMv1 + challenge - by m1ck3yb33 - 05-29-2024, 02:47 PM