07-11-2025, 05:18 AM
Nevermind, I updated to the git version and this specific error went away. I had other errors, but none of them fully stopped the run of the full benchmark suite as this one was doing.
Results can be viewed in (JSON format) here:
https://gist.github.com/whoisroot/315d5b...23bf9d0362
Some hash types are missing because of errors while running the benchmarks, but I think most of the relevant types are there.
Interesting results (YMMV):
* NetNTLMv2 (NT) -> 40.78% better without CUDA
* NTLM -> 17.16% better without CUDA
* WPA-PMK-PMKID+EAPOL -> 37.89% better without CUDA
* Cisco-IOS $9$ (scrypt) -> 62.51% better without CUDA
* md5(utf16le($pass)) -> 18.60% better without CUDA
* md5(utf16le($pass).$salt) -> 31.25% better without CUDA
I'll post the full "tools" later, but they are just a couple hacky Python scripts that ingest "--machine-readable" logs.
Results can be viewed in (JSON format) here:
https://gist.github.com/whoisroot/315d5b...23bf9d0362
Some hash types are missing because of errors while running the benchmarks, but I think most of the relevant types are there.
Interesting results (YMMV):
* NetNTLMv2 (NT) -> 40.78% better without CUDA
* NTLM -> 17.16% better without CUDA
* WPA-PMK-PMKID+EAPOL -> 37.89% better without CUDA
* Cisco-IOS $9$ (scrypt) -> 62.51% better without CUDA
* md5(utf16le($pass)) -> 18.60% better without CUDA
* md5(utf16le($pass).$salt) -> 31.25% better without CUDA
I'll post the full "tools" later, but they are just a couple hacky Python scripts that ingest "--machine-readable" logs.