7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512
#3
(08-26-2025, 02:05 PM)atom Wrote: It should not, please update to latest CUDA version 12.9 or higher.

Hi. I installed CUDA version 13.0...But 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2


hashcat (v7.1.2) starting

CUDA API (CUDA 13.0)
====================
* Device #01: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, 9400/9875 MB, 68MCU

OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 13.0.78) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
=======================================================================
* Device #02: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, skipped

Minimum password length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 256
Minimum salt length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum salt length supported by kernel: 256

Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1

Optimizers applied:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
* Uses-64-Bit
* Register-Limit

ATTENTION! Pure (unoptimized) backend kernels selected.
Pure kernels can crack longer passwords, but drastically reduce performance.
If you want to switch to optimized kernels, append -O to your commandline.
See the above message to find out about the exact limits.

Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c

Host memory allocated for this attack: 1267 MB (61238 MB free)

Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: /media/ntfs1/dictionary/dict.dic
* Passwords.: 855284955
* Bytes.....: 10027391827
* Keyspace..: 855284955

Cracking performance lower than expected?

* Append -O to the commandline.
  This lowers the maximum supported password/salt length (usually down to 32).

* Append -w 3 to the commandline.
  This can cause your screen to lag.

* Append -S to the commandline.
  This has a drastic speed impact but can be better for specific attacks.
  Typical scenarios are a small wordlist but a large ruleset.

* Update your backend API runtime / driver the right way:
  https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver

* Create more work items to make use of your parallelization power:
  https://hashcat.net/faq/morework

[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>


Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 1800 (sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix))
Hash.Target......: $6$rounds=10000$salt$data_hash
Time.Started.....: Wed Aug 27 13:13:54 2025 (15 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Thu Aug 28 01:11:19 2025 (11 hours, 57 mins)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel (password length 0-256 bytes)
Guess.Base.......: File (/media/ntfs1/dictionary/dict.dic)
Guess.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
[b]Speed.#01........:    19870 H/s
(15.28ms) @ Accel:4 Loops:124 Thr:96 Vec:1
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests (total), 0/1 (0.00%) Digests (new)
Progress.........: 261120/855284955 (0.03%)
Rejected.........: 0/261120 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 261120/855284955 (0.03%)
Restore.Sub.#01..: Salt:0 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:7440-7564
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#01...: !nc4rcer4+0rs -> !ngra+e$
Hardware.Mon.#01.: Temp: 55c Fan: 59% Util: 99% Core:1950MHz Mem:9251MHz Bus:16

[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit => q
Reply


Messages In This Thread
7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by zamgold - 08-26-2025, 12:44 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-26-2025, 02:05 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by zamgold - 08-27-2025, 10:15 AM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-27-2025, 11:38 AM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-28-2025, 03:49 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-28-2025, 04:53 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-28-2025, 08:15 PM