7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512
#7
(08-27-2025, 04:25 PM)matrix Wrote:
(08-27-2025, 12:11 PM)zamgold Wrote:
(08-27-2025, 11:38 AM)atom Wrote: OK, please run again command on 7.1.2, add to command line: -n256 -u128 -T128 --force

that didn't help Sad

But it can help us. Could you paste the output for the test Jens asked you to do? Thanks

No problem. My command and output:

./hashcat -n256 -u128 -T128 --force -m 1800 -a 0 1800.hash /media/ntfs1/dictionary/dict.dic

hashcat (v7.1.2) starting

You have enabled --force to bypass dangerous warnings and errors!
This can hide serious problems and should only be done when debugging.
Do not report hashcat issues encountered when using --force.

CUDA API (CUDA 13.0)
====================
* Device #01: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, 9400/9875 MB, 68MCU

OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 13.0.78) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
=======================================================================
* Device #02: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, skipped

Minimum password length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 256
Minimum salt length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum salt length supported by kernel: 256

Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1

Optimizers applied:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
* Uses-64-Bit
* Register-Limit

ATTENTION! Pure (unoptimized) backend kernels selected.
Pure kernels can crack longer passwords, but drastically reduce performance.
If you want to switch to optimized kernels, append -O to your commandline.
See the above message to find out about the exact limits.

Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c

Host memory allocated for this attack: 1109 MB (60685 MB free)

Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: /media/ntfs1/dictionary/dict.dic
* Passwords.: 855284955
* Bytes.....: 10027391827
* Keyspace..: 855284955

[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>


Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 1800 (sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix))
Hash.Target......: $6$rounds=10000$salt$data_hash
Time.Started.....: Thu Aug 28 15:05:58 2025, (42 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Fri Aug 29 03:25:01 2025, (12 hours, 18 mins)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel (password length 0-256 bytes)
Guess.Base.......: File (/media/ntfs1/dictionary/dict.dic)
Guess.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
[b]Speed.#01........:    19306 H/s (1471.60ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:128 Thr:128 Vec:1[/b]
Recovered........: 0/1 (0.00%) Digests (total), 0/1 (0.00%) Digests (new)
Progress.........: 0/855284955 (0.00%)
Rejected.........: 0/0 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 0/855284955 (0.00%)
Restore.Sub.#01..: Salt:0 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:3712-3840
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#01...: $HEX[2020202020202020] -> 00v53u9b7fayqgva
Hardware.Mon.#01.: Temp: 62c Fan: 70% Util:100% Core:1935MHz Mem:9251MHz Bus:16
Reply


Messages In This Thread
7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by zamgold - 08-26-2025, 12:44 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-26-2025, 02:05 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-27-2025, 11:38 AM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by zamgold - 08-28-2025, 12:07 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-28-2025, 03:49 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-28-2025, 04:53 PM
RE: 7.1.2 slower than 6.1.2 for SHA512 - by atom - 08-28-2025, 08:15 PM