06-04-2012, 01:42 PM
Thank you for taking the time to test that atom.
Just for you I devoted all Sunday to upgrading my cracking machine to Win7 and all new drivers just for hashcat-plus ! .... If Win7 is considered upgrading !
Anyway I was going to report that this "effect" was present when using Win 7 ocl-hascat-plus v0.8 and the new beta whilst also using the latest beta of hashcat.
After seeing your explanation I understand why. To prove your point more conclusively I shall separate my word lists by line length which "should" give a different result.
I know you are already considering it and you have explained the reasons you haven't migrated the table look-up feature to ocl-hascat-plus yet but I think this confirms it does need porting to be effective.
The table look-up feature is so very useful for leet words and also toggling. I personally think it is one of your best rule options and would very much like to see it added to ocl-hascat-plus when you work out how.
Thanks again atom for testing this query out for me.
Just for you I devoted all Sunday to upgrading my cracking machine to Win7 and all new drivers just for hashcat-plus ! .... If Win7 is considered upgrading !
Anyway I was going to report that this "effect" was present when using Win 7 ocl-hascat-plus v0.8 and the new beta whilst also using the latest beta of hashcat.
After seeing your explanation I understand why. To prove your point more conclusively I shall separate my word lists by line length which "should" give a different result.
I know you are already considering it and you have explained the reasons you haven't migrated the table look-up feature to ocl-hascat-plus yet but I think this confirms it does need porting to be effective.
The table look-up feature is so very useful for leet words and also toggling. I personally think it is one of your best rule options and would very much like to see it added to ocl-hascat-plus when you work out how.
Thanks again atom for testing this query out for me.