oclHashcat-plus --show question
#4
M@LIK: you mean byte not bit.

Code:
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.09# echo -n 133358115 | ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 3000 '9a97671609cb7fcdc79845a985b69350'
** Valid keyfile for beta usage: atom (expires 04.05.2013)

oclHashcat-plus v0.09 by atom starting...

Hashes: 2
Unique digests: 2
Bitmaps: 8 bits, 256 entries, 0x000000ff mask, 1024 bytes
Rules: 1
GPU-Loops: 32
GPU-Accel: 40
Password lengths range: 1 - 7
Platform: AMD compatible platform found
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 70c
Device #1: Cayman, 1024MB, 830Mhz, 24MCU
Device #2: Cayman, 1024MB, 830Mhz, 24MCU
Device #1: Allocating 72MB host-memory
Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m3000_a0.Cayman.64.kernel (1214876 bytes)
Device #2: Allocating 72MB host-memory
Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m3000_a0.Cayman.64.kernel (1214876 bytes)

Starting attack in wordlist stdin mode...    

c79845a985b69350:15                          
9a97671609cb7fcd:1333581                    
                                            
Status.......: Cracked
Input.Mode...: Pipe
Hash.Target..: 9a97671609cb7fcdc79845a985b69350
Hash.Type....: LM
Time.Running.: 1 sec
Time.Util....: 1002.9ms/0.0ms Real/CPU, 0.0% idle
Speed........:        2 c/s Real,        0 c/s GPU
Recovered....: 2/2 Digests, 1/1 Salts
Progress.....: 2
Rejected.....: 0
HWMon.GPU.#1.:  0% Util, 41c Temp, 29% Fan
HWMon.GPU.#2.:  0% Util, 41c Temp, 30% Fan

Started: Wed May 16 10:28:53 2012
Stopped: Wed May 16 10:28:55 2012

And then with show to get full password:

Code:
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.09# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 3000 '9a97671609cb7fcdc79845a985b69350' --show --quiet
9a97671609cb7fcdc79845a985b69350:133358115

I dont see any problem at all. I think your problem was that you forgot to set the -m 3000 when using --show


Messages In This Thread
oclHashcat-plus --show question - by Mem5 - 05-13-2012, 06:50 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus --show question - by atom - 05-16-2012, 10:33 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus --show question - by M@LIK - 05-16-2012, 12:22 PM
RE: Bruteforce LM - by Mem5 - 05-15-2012, 07:57 AM
RE: Bruteforce LM - by M@LIK - 05-15-2012, 01:53 PM