cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ?
#14
(08-22-2012, 09:50 AM)atom Wrote: Looks like this is an gtx 6xx problem. Can you please try with oclHashcat-lite? It ships with some kernels compiled with a new cuda sdk.

I can also confirm that it is 'working' with the lite version. However, the rate is not what I'm expecting. I only get 136M c/s for ntlm on GT650M. Can someone confirm if that's expected?


Messages In This Thread
cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 05:11 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by D3ad0ne - 08-21-2012, 05:13 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 05:16 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by Mem5 - 08-21-2012, 07:44 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 09:04 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-21-2012, 10:30 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 11:00 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by radix - 08-21-2012, 11:19 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 11:25 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by bob - 08-22-2012, 12:02 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-22-2012, 09:50 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-23-2012, 11:32 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by bob - 08-22-2012, 06:11 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-22-2012, 07:12 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-23-2012, 01:27 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by bob - 08-23-2012, 05:55 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-24-2012, 04:38 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-24-2012, 02:20 PM