Trac is here and you may need to register if not already done (since trac is seperate from the forum and you need to create a new account there).
The algorithm you want to request is md5(md5($pass).$salt) ... since of course the devs would not add a algorithm with hard-coded constants (9486).
There are already "similar" algorithms, like md5(md5($salt).$pass) - see here .
In theory you could use a dictionary containing only 9486 and an external salt list (-e argument)... but I wouldn't really recommend it since it may be *much* slower than a new hash mode that does it the other way around (i.e. $salt is salt and $pass is the pass): md5(md5($pass).$salt).
Note: if such an algorithm would be implemented you still may need to either use -e for the external salt (in this case only a file containing the number 9486), or you need to append to *each* hash in the hashlist ":9486").
The algorithm you want to request is md5(md5($pass).$salt) ... since of course the devs would not add a algorithm with hard-coded constants (9486).
There are already "similar" algorithms, like md5(md5($salt).$pass) - see here .
In theory you could use a dictionary containing only 9486 and an external salt list (-e argument)... but I wouldn't really recommend it since it may be *much* slower than a new hash mode that does it the other way around (i.e. $salt is salt and $pass is the pass): md5(md5($pass).$salt).
Note: if such an algorithm would be implemented you still may need to either use -e for the external salt (in this case only a file containing the number 9486), or you need to append to *each* hash in the hashlist ":9486").