hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules
#3
(11-10-2015, 09:53 AM)atom Wrote:
Quote:bf.rule created with maskprocessor to append 3 digits: ./mp.bin -o bf.rule '$?d?d?d'

Looks wrong, I think you wanted to do:

Quote:bf.rule created with maskprocessor to append 3 digits: ./mp.bin -o bf.rule '$?d $?d $?d'

I did as you suggested and tried it again with the same command line and the new bf.rule, which cats out as

$9 $9 $0
$9 $9 $1
$9 $9 $2
$9 $9 $3
$9 $9 $4
$9 $9 $5
$9 $9 $6
$9 $9 $7
$9 $9 $8
$9 $9 $9

the last four words in my test list are:

abuse
abused
acacia
accept

and it it still looks the same to me, still with some skips and dupes:

acceptabundant996
acceptabundant997
acceptabundant998
acceptabundant999
acceptabuse996
acceptabuse997
acceptabuse998
acceptabuse999
acceptabused996
acceptabused997
acceptabused998
acceptabuse999
acceptacacia996
acceptacacia997
acceptabused998
acceptabuse999
acceptaccept996
acceptacacia997
acceptabused998
acceptabuse999

what do you think?


Messages In This Thread
hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by db60 - 11-09-2015, 06:46 AM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by atom - 11-10-2015, 09:53 AM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by db60 - 11-10-2015, 09:54 PM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by mastercracker - 11-12-2015, 12:48 PM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by db60 - 11-12-2015, 06:22 PM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by mastercracker - 11-13-2015, 12:39 PM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by db60 - 11-13-2015, 01:55 PM
RE: hashcat v0.50 hybrid rules - by atom - 11-15-2015, 11:29 AM