Too many collisions with -m 9720
#6
If you are referring to the initial post https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-3665-po...l#pid20935 you need to know that this thread was opened before devs even thought about implementing the -m 9710 and -m 9720 kernels (this was the testing phase for only -m 9700 - there was no -m 9710 and -m 9720 yet). You can even see this code he posted:

Code:
if ((digest[0] == swap_workaround (0xf2ab1219)) && ((digest[1] & 0xff) == swap_workaround (0xae000000)))

after atom found the "brute force" result:
$oldoffice$1*d6aabb63363188b9b73a88efb9c9152e*afbbb9254764273f8f4fad9a5d82981f*6f09fd2eafc4ade522b5f2bee0eaf66d:$HEX[f2ab1219ae]

This means, in this particular case you shouldn't rely (only) on the very first post (or at least read the full thread), because there are updates (like this one https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-3665-po...l#pid20945 ), where atom explains the progress and introduces -m 9710 and -m 9720.
Of course it is possible to use -m 9700 to run ?b?b?b?b?b, but the general idea is (again, after -m 9710 and -m 9720 were implemented) that you use -m 9710 and -m 9720 if you want to find collisions.



And to answer your original question: actually the main idea of this collision finding was to collect/see as many collisions as possible.
But I actually have a clever trick for you (but please promise me to not tell it to anyone Wink, you can use this command, to almost immediately stop after finding the first collision for the hash(es):
Code:
cudaHashcat64.exe -m 9720 --outfile-check-timer 1 --outfile-check-dir out\ -o out\collision.txt m09720.txt -a 3 ?b?b?b?b?b
(make sure that the folder out\ exist before running oclHashcat)
the outfile-check timer will mark the hash as cracked and therefore oclHashcat will stop cracking Smile

Again, this is a hack and normally you would not need to use -m 9720 like this (stop after first found).


Messages In This Thread
Too many collisions with -m 9720 - by Mem5 - 01-06-2016, 09:40 AM
RE: Too many collisions with -m 9720 - by Mem5 - 01-23-2016, 12:39 PM
RE: Too many collisions with -m 9720 - by philsmd - 01-23-2016, 01:05 PM
RE: Too many collisions with -m 9720 - by Mem5 - 01-23-2016, 04:58 PM
RE: Too many collisions with -m 9720 - by philsmd - 01-23-2016, 05:15 PM
RE: Too many collisions with -m 9720 - by Mem5 - 01-25-2016, 10:23 PM