970 underperforming?
#5
(01-18-2016, 03:15 AM)epixoip Wrote: Well when you say you're comparing apples and oranges, you're saying 8100 MH/s for brute force, but that must be multi-hash not single hash. Multi-hash loses about 50% performance over single hash, so I bet your single hash speeds are around 16200 MH/s which is a lot closer to the 20000 MH/s you're expecting.

should be a good idea to introduce in the performance benchmarking the gflop indication? maybe in the form:
card 0 cuda cores clock xxx g-tflop yyyy
card 1 cuda cores clock zzz g-tflop www


Messages In This Thread
970 underperforming? - by Betawave - 01-18-2016, 01:31 AM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by epixoip - 01-18-2016, 01:37 AM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by Betawave - 01-18-2016, 02:52 AM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by epixoip - 01-18-2016, 03:15 AM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by n_lona - 01-18-2016, 05:28 PM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by epixoip - 01-18-2016, 06:57 PM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by Betawave - 01-19-2016, 12:20 AM
RE: 970 underperforming? - by epixoip - 01-19-2016, 01:16 AM