Shrinking mask attacks
#4
(02-02-2016, 03:24 PM)rico Wrote: btw, ?a is already defined as ?a = ?l?u?d?s so your mask is just ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a
It's still to damn long though...

And this is actually an invalid mask. oclHashcat calulcates keyspace as a 64-bit integer, so ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a is the largest ?a mask possible. Anything longer than length 9 will cause an integer overflow.


Messages In This Thread
Shrinking mask attacks - by Bananaman - 02-02-2016, 07:22 AM
RE: Shrinking mask attacks - by rico - 02-02-2016, 03:24 PM
RE: Shrinking mask attacks - by epixoip - 02-02-2016, 11:44 PM
RE: Shrinking mask attacks - by jodler303 - 02-02-2016, 09:06 PM