hashcat Forum › Support › hashcat v
Bruteforce + rules

Thread Closed 
Linear Mode
Bruteforce + rules
royce Offline
Moderator à la mode
******
Posts: 929
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2015
#9
11-22-2017, 05:43 PM
I'm guessing ... but if I had to say, it's probably that in practice, most attacks are possible without it (by chaining stuff together, Unix-style) - so adding it internally could (arguably) add unnecessary complexity to the hashcat code.
~
Find
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-22-2017, 03:22 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by phahRoe1 - 11-22-2017, 04:21 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-22-2017, 04:35 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by royce - 11-22-2017, 04:50 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-22-2017, 05:02 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by royce - 11-22-2017, 05:32 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by royce - 11-22-2017, 06:20 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-22-2017, 02:42 PM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by royce - 11-22-2017, 05:43 PM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by epixoip - 11-22-2017, 08:06 PM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-22-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by royce - 11-22-2017, 08:33 PM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-23-2017, 03:45 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by royce - 11-23-2017, 06:18 AM
RE: Bruteforce + rules - by asirena - 11-24-2017, 09:56 PM