Support for new ASP.NET password storage practices
#2
Who thought that "PBKDF2_SHA1(pw, salt, 1000, 256)" is a good idea?
Because CPU hash crackers are going to:
* Checking the first 160 bits gets you 2x faster than defender.
* SSE2 gets you 4x faster than defender.
* Cached HMAC gets you 2x faster than defender (this might be used).
* AVX2 (q2 2013) will give you another 2x faster than defender.

Then there's GPUs...

Also 1000 was the minimum recommended 12 years ago.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Support for new ASP.NET password storage practices - by Sc00bz - 11-15-2012, 06:20 AM