Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12
#2
On the plus side, I'm pleased with the gains for Office97, that actually brings it up to 980 performance.

But I think some investigation is needed. It's strange to me that DEScrypt would go down so much, yet LM basically stayed the same and Oracle 7g went up. Similarly, raw SHA512 only went down a little bit, but HMAC-SHA512 and sha512crypt especially took massive hits. Something doesn't add up there.


Messages In This Thread
Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by atom - 12-22-2014, 05:56 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by epixoip - 12-22-2014, 07:10 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by boyferret - 12-29-2014, 06:31 AM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by epixoip - 12-29-2014, 06:53 AM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by atom - 12-29-2014, 06:39 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by mariaki - 12-30-2014, 12:20 AM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by atom - 12-30-2014, 03:28 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by atom - 12-30-2014, 03:28 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by epixoip - 12-30-2014, 11:32 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by atom - 01-05-2015, 06:15 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by ati6990 - 01-05-2015, 06:47 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by mariaki - 01-07-2015, 04:38 AM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by atom - 01-09-2015, 05:45 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by rickm - 01-09-2015, 09:35 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by epixoip - 01-09-2015, 10:35 PM
RE: Catalyst v14.9 vs 14.12 - by fapcrazed - 01-10-2015, 06:18 AM