Bitslice status and broken nvcc
#13
(10-30-2015, 05:42 PM)atom Wrote: #define mysel(a,b,c) (bitselect (a,b,(c) ? 0xffffffff : 0)) -- Getting 251 MH/s

So there's a drop from 470 MH/s to 251 for dynamic salt support. I'll take it for now as we also get the multihash support with it.

More News!

So by telling the OpenCL runtime to disable the compiler optimization (-cl-opt-disable) the speed increased from 251 MH/s to 355 MH/s, lol. If you guys want to play with it, it's in b22+

About 20GH:

With b22 version and +250Mhz on the TitanX we can get > 20GH on a single card. With 250Mhz on the 980Ti we're somewhere around 18GH.


Messages In This Thread
Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 10-24-2015, 11:04 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by royce - 10-25-2015, 07:40 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 10-25-2015, 09:07 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by Rolf - 10-26-2015, 10:12 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 10-26-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by Rolf - 10-26-2015, 10:21 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by magnum - 10-30-2015, 03:24 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 10-30-2015, 05:42 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by magnum - 10-31-2015, 02:13 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 11-02-2015, 03:25 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by magnum - 10-31-2015, 02:21 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by Xanadrel - 10-31-2015, 11:42 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by magnum - 11-01-2015, 02:03 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by Rolf - 11-04-2015, 10:19 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 11-04-2015, 10:50 AM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by Rolf - 11-04-2015, 05:15 PM
RE: Bitslice status and broken nvcc - by atom - 11-10-2015, 09:23 AM