12-03-2015, 11:25 PM
(12-03-2015, 02:45 PM)Mem5 Wrote:(12-03-2015, 10:30 AM)epixoip Wrote: It's a potential workaround, not a magic fix.Ok, got it.
Quote:You should be using cpu hashcat for this attack.Hum, Cpu Hashcat gives 33Mh/s while cudahashcat give 500Mh/s, so even with the message 'attention..' I would continue to use GPU
Calling experts: Is the above true or is the rate an indicated rather than actual rate? I've noticed the same thing in my limited testing and wondered why GPUs aren't used even for sub-optimal GPU tasks if they run through many more hashes than a CPU (albeit inefficiently). Can anyone clarify?