06-05-2017, 10:34 AM
You really like messing things up.
RyZen 1800X can only be compared with Core i7 7700K from all that huge list you posted, just for impression.
ALL the other Intel chips belong to Intel's HEDT family, which is the worst case scenario for anyone to buy.
I mean it has the worst price/ performance ratio compared to RyZen and in terms of raw performance and perf/ price you should compare all that ridiculous CPUs with the AMD's HEDT platform which is RyZen Threadripper.
Threadripper is going to have, really have, up to 16C/32T with quad channel DDR4-3200 support and 64 PCI-e v3.0 lanes across the whole line!
I mean from 10C/20T to 16C/32T all nine Threadripper models will have quad channel DDR4-3200 support and 64 PCI-e v3.0 lanes.
Just as you were wrong regarding VEGA being slower than Nvidia 1080, you are simply wrong here too, since I don't see real figures of real-world apps like hashcat for the comparison I asked:
RyZen 1800X vs Core i7 7700K
And the Infinity Fabric is a great tool in the hands of AMD in order to produce REAL multi or mega-core CPUs like EPYC which is going to be officially released on June 20th with 32C/64T , 8 channel (!) DDR4 memory support and 128 (!) PCI-e v3.0 lanes.
And you can use Infinity Fabric as a high performance - low latency glue to scale perfectly with a second EPYC 32C/64T in order to get a linear performance of 64C/128T on a dual socket system.
As you can understand, it can eat your Xeons for breakfast, as the demos have already shown.
For 2018, AMD has already announced a EPYC 48C/96T CPU obviously using that weapon, called Infinity Fabric.
BTW, VEGA is using Infinity Fabric too and is going to amaze us in use with RyZen APUs
RyZen 1800X can only be compared with Core i7 7700K from all that huge list you posted, just for impression.
ALL the other Intel chips belong to Intel's HEDT family, which is the worst case scenario for anyone to buy.
I mean it has the worst price/ performance ratio compared to RyZen and in terms of raw performance and perf/ price you should compare all that ridiculous CPUs with the AMD's HEDT platform which is RyZen Threadripper.
Threadripper is going to have, really have, up to 16C/32T with quad channel DDR4-3200 support and 64 PCI-e v3.0 lanes across the whole line!
I mean from 10C/20T to 16C/32T all nine Threadripper models will have quad channel DDR4-3200 support and 64 PCI-e v3.0 lanes.
Just as you were wrong regarding VEGA being slower than Nvidia 1080, you are simply wrong here too, since I don't see real figures of real-world apps like hashcat for the comparison I asked:
RyZen 1800X vs Core i7 7700K
And the Infinity Fabric is a great tool in the hands of AMD in order to produce REAL multi or mega-core CPUs like EPYC which is going to be officially released on June 20th with 32C/64T , 8 channel (!) DDR4 memory support and 128 (!) PCI-e v3.0 lanes.
And you can use Infinity Fabric as a high performance - low latency glue to scale perfectly with a second EPYC 32C/64T in order to get a linear performance of 64C/128T on a dual socket system.
As you can understand, it can eat your Xeons for breakfast, as the demos have already shown.
For 2018, AMD has already announced a EPYC 48C/96T CPU obviously using that weapon, called Infinity Fabric.
BTW, VEGA is using Infinity Fabric too and is going to amaze us in use with RyZen APUs