07-10-2017, 10:21 PM
Sorry I didn't want to interrupt this thread, but as you commented about the hashcat code there's no way to ignore.
You're absolutely right when you say that the hashcat code is optimized for Intel and NVidia, but you're also absolutely wrong about AMD. Hashcat is very much optimized for AMD, the same way it is as for Intel and NVidia. There's no reason to not optimize for any of them. The project is free since the first minute and I've rejected *every* donation offer since ever. I myself own both NV and AMD cards and before I release anything new, I always test it on all vendors.
You can be sure that hashcat gets the best out of the AMD hardware possible.
You talk about VEGA is faster than 1080. That's nice if it's true. Can you please provide a hashcat -b output? Thanks!
You're absolutely right when you say that the hashcat code is optimized for Intel and NVidia, but you're also absolutely wrong about AMD. Hashcat is very much optimized for AMD, the same way it is as for Intel and NVidia. There's no reason to not optimize for any of them. The project is free since the first minute and I've rejected *every* donation offer since ever. I myself own both NV and AMD cards and before I release anything new, I always test it on all vendors.
You can be sure that hashcat gets the best out of the AMD hardware possible.
You talk about VEGA is faster than 1080. That's nice if it's true. Can you please provide a hashcat -b output? Thanks!