hashcat v 4.0.0
#8
# hashcat (4.0.0-rc4) tests:
hashcat64.exe -b -w 3 -m 1000 --machine-readable
gives 27'292'689'606

hashcat64.exe -b -w 3 -m 1000 -O --machine-readable
gives 77'160'705'549

So.. I should always use optimized kernels, right ?
When one (like me) put -w AND -O, it seems -O wins ?


Messages In This Thread
hashcat v 4.0.0 - by TesTergH - 10-09-2017, 08:38 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by undeath - 10-09-2017, 11:06 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by TesTergH - 10-09-2017, 11:44 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by Mem5 - 10-10-2017, 12:10 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by Chick3nman - 10-10-2017, 04:42 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by undeath - 10-10-2017, 04:46 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by Chick3nman - 10-10-2017, 04:51 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by Mem5 - 10-10-2017, 06:56 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by undeath - 10-10-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: hashcat v 4.0.0 - by atom - 10-11-2017, 03:59 PM