Speed comparison WPA/WPA2 (2500) vs WPA/WPA2 PMK (2501)
#7
(01-06-2020, 02:34 PM)ZerBea Wrote: You can't compare 2500 to 2501 and 16800 to 16801.
2500 and 16800 are hash modes to get a PSK, while 2501 and 16801 hash modes are used to verify a given(!) PMK.

BTW:
Both modes 250x and 1680x are deprecated, soon. Successor is hash mode 2200x

$ hashcat -V
v5.1.0-1547-g8e0f976c

$ hashcat --help
  22000 | WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL                          | Network Protocols
  22001 | WPA-PMK-PMKID+EAPOL                              | Network Protocols

Advantages:
- easy to handle
- hash file is HEX ASCII (no longer binary)
- full reuse of PBKDF2 over PMKID and EAPOL (speed improvement)
- and more...

Nice, and it's even nicer that mode 22000 still receives the old binary .hccapx format.

But I found that if I'm using a 4800000-lines dictionary and a 1000-lines rule, mode 22000 is 20% slower than mode 2500, using GTX1080, CUDA 10.2 API on Linux, compiled by myself using Arch User Repository. The version number is v5.1.0-1755-gddb641b8+
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Speed comparison WPA/WPA2 (2500) vs WPA/WPA2 PMK (2501) - by reese_wang - 03-23-2020, 05:39 AM