Rules in 16800 don't work?
#7
(06-30-2020, 11:10 AM)philsmd Wrote: it's exactly like undeath explained above.
Without the -S slow mode the passwords that are too short (from the dict) are rejected immediately, while the -S mode is slow because it mangles the words with rules already on the host (CPU). This is just a speed tradeoff, a design decision. A known limitation

Do I understand this correctly: you need to use -S only if dictionary contains words which are shorter than 8 characters before any rules are applied? 

Then it makes sense.

If dictionary has both short (<8) and long (8 or more chars) words, are rules applied correctly to longer words even without -S?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Rules in 16800 don't work? - by FinPeter - 06-30-2020, 09:54 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by undeath - 06-30-2020, 10:07 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by FinPeter - 06-30-2020, 10:41 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by atom - 06-30-2020, 10:16 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by FinPeter - 06-30-2020, 10:46 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by philsmd - 06-30-2020, 11:10 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by FinPeter - 06-30-2020, 11:35 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by blacktraffic - 07-01-2020, 10:12 AM
RE: Rules in 16800 don't work? - by undeath - 06-30-2020, 11:13 PM