Mask processor suggestion
#3
Hi royce. Ok plain math suggests that if you know you have it fairly randomized and you know that you don’t have x repetitive charscters , you should have 10s of percentage points off. If your crack would take a year and and you shave only 10% off ,you reduce but a month.
That’s a big step in time.
But ok, let’s try this the other way. Mask processor has -q-r already.. 
why aren’t they better implemented? For example, -q 1 doesn’t not work as it requires 2, but it actually only means 1 consequitive same character (?!?) and -r 1 does not work since it needs to be as big or bigger than -qSmile
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Mask processor suggestion - by vicious1 - 01-16-2021, 07:17 PM
RE: Mask processor suggestion - by royce - 01-18-2021, 05:44 AM
RE: Mask processor suggestion - by vicious1 - 01-18-2021, 06:54 AM
RE: Mask processor suggestion - by the_charm - 01-18-2021, 04:32 PM
RE: Mask processor suggestion - by vicious1 - 01-18-2021, 06:23 PM