hashcat Forum › Deprecated; Previous versions › Old hashcat Support v
3 questions..

Threaded Mode
3 questions..
23732 Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 16
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2012
#11
09-04-2012, 10:28 PM
GTX560Ti is better than the Quadro 600, but only 25k c/s total, at most. A 6950 can do almost 70k c/s.

Here is some estimations: http://golubev.com/gpuest.htm
Find
epixoip Offline
Legend
******
Posts: 2,936
Threads: 12
Joined: May 2012
#12
09-05-2012, 01:49 PM (This post was last modified: 09-05-2012, 01:50 PM by epixoip.)
(09-04-2012, 09:47 PM)greg232 Wrote: Your tests indicate 134.3k c/s, 39224 c/s, 182.7k c/s, 25608 c/s using hd7970, gtx570, hd6990, gtx560Ti. These cards do not have such GFLOPS advantage over Quadro 600 to justify such high WPA results. How can this be?

Quadro 600 - 245 GFLOPS
GTX 560Ti - 1263 GFLOPS
GTX 570 - 1405 GFLOPS
HD 7970 - 4300 GFLOPS
HD 6990 - 5100 GFLOPS

Tell me again how those cards do not have a significant GFLOPS advantage over the Quadro 600...
Find
greg232 Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
#13
09-09-2012, 02:34 PM
(09-05-2012, 01:49 PM)epixoip Wrote: Tell me again how those cards do not have a significant GFLOPS advantage over the Quadro 600...

So I was wrong. Thank you all for all the answers and information.
Find