| 
		
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 18Threads: 6
 Joined: Jan 2011
 
	
	
		I found plus is much slower than oclhashcat 0.26. 
 For cracking 700m md5 hashes.
 oclhashcat 1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -->3300M/s
 oclhashcat-plus 1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -a 3  --<2200M/s
 
 2x hd6970.
 
 For cracking old mysql hashes, I have to use oclhashcat 0.25 also.
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 127Threads: 16
 Joined: Sep 2011
 
	
	
		Try increasing the -n value. It makes a big difference in some cases. Also for some hash types I've found that increasing --gpu-loops helps.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 18Threads: 6
 Joined: Jan 2011
 
	
	
		 (01-02-2012, 05:15 AM)chort Wrote:  Try increasing the -n value. It makes a big difference in some cases. Also for some hash types I've found that increasing --gpu-loops helps. 
I tried many different parameters , but no help. 
Now I changed my system date back to 2011 for oclhashcat.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,232Threads: 233
 Joined: Apr 2010
 
	
	
		plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed    700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpredictable. maximum i tested was 24000000 hashes at once.
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 18Threads: 6
 Joined: Jan 2011
 
	
		
		
		01-02-2012, 01:55 PM 
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2012, 02:18 PM by nobody.)
		
	 
		 (01-02-2012, 11:16 AM)atom Wrote:  plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed  700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpredictable. maximum i tested was 24000000 hashes at once. 
Sorry I made a mistake, the number is 700000.
 
 
This is the detail information  two hd5870 cards, driver 11.12, windows server 2008  r2)
 Quote:T:\run\oclHashcat-plus>oclHashcat-plus64.exe  1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d  -o 1.outoclHashcat-plus v0.07 by atom starting...
 
 Hashes: 701692
 Unique digests: 701692
 Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
 GPU-Loops: 128
 GPU-Accel: 40
 Password lengths range: 1 - 15
 Platform: AMD compatible platform found
 Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled
 Device #1: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
 Device #2: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
 Device #1: Allocating 120MB host-memory
 Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a3.Cypress.64.kernel (221300 bytes)
 Device #2: Allocating 120MB host-memory
 Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a3.Cypress.64.kernel (221300 bytes)
 
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
 Status.......: Running
 Input.Mode...: Mask (?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1)
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Time.Running.: 4 secs
 Time.Left....: 15 hours, 0 mins
 Time.Util....: 4992.5ms/43.3ms Real/CPU, 0.9% idle
 Speed........:  1879.8M c/s Real,  1912.2M c/s GPU
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 9384755200/101559956668416 (0.01%)
 Rejected.....: 0/9384755200 (0.00%)
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => q
 
 Status.......: Aborted
 Input.Mode...: Mask (?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1)
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Time.Running.: 9 secs
 Time.Left....: 14 hours, 55 mins
 Time.Util....: 9788.2ms/43.3ms Real/CPU, 0.4% idle
 Speed........:  1890.8M c/s Real,  1847.3M c/s GPU
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 18507366400/101559956668416 (0.02%)
 Rejected.....: 0/18507366400 (0.00%)
 
 Started: Sun Jan 02 20:00:38 2011
 Stopped: Sun Jan 02 20:00:49 2011
 
 T:\run\oclHashcat-plus>cd ..
 
 T:\run>cd oclHashcat
 
 T:\run\oclHashcat>oclHashcat64.exe ..\oclHashcat-plus\1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d
 oclHashcat v0.26 by atom starting...
 
 Digests: 701692 entries, 701692 unique
 Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
 Platform: AMD compatible platform found
 Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled
 Device #1: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
 Device #2: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
 NOTE: gpu-accel auto-adjusted to: 80
 Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000.Cypress.64.kernel
 Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000.Cypress.64.kernel
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
 Status.......: Running
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Mode.Left....: Mask '?1?1?1?1?1' (60466176)
 Mode.Right...: Mask '?1?1?1?1' (1679616)
 Speed.GPU*...: 3359.9M/s
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 6160384000/101559956668416 (0.01%)
 Running......: 1 sec
 Estimated....: 8 hours, 23 mins
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
 Status.......: Running
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Mode.Left....: Mask '?1?1?1?1?1' (60466176)
 Mode.Right...: Mask '?1?1?1?1' (1679616)
 Speed.GPU*...: 3329.0M/s
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 13841203200/101559956668416 (0.01%)
 Running......: 4 secs
 Estimated....: 8 hours, 28 mins
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => q
 
 Status.......: Aborted
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Mode.Left....: Mask '?1?1?1?1?1' (60466176)
 Mode.Right...: Mask '?1?1?1?1' (1679616)
 Speed.GPU*...: 3387.3M/s
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 17799577600/101559956668416 (0.02%)
 Running......: 5 secs
 Estimated....: 8 hours, 19 mins
 
 Started: Sun Jan 02 20:01:34 2011
 Stopped: Sun Jan 02 20:01:41 2011
 
 T:\run\oclHashcat>
 
Another computer(two hd6970 cards, driver 11.12 ,windows 2008 r2)
 Quote:Y:\run\oclHashcat-plus>oclHashcat-plus64.exe  1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d  -o 1.outoclHashcat-plus v0.07 by atom starting...
 
 Hashes: 701692
 Unique digests: 701692
 Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
 GPU-Loops: 128
 GPU-Accel: 40
 Password lengths range: 1 - 15
 Platform: AMD compatible platform found
 Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled
 Device #1: Cayman, 2048MB, 0Mhz, 24MCU
 Device #2: Cayman, 2048MB, 0Mhz, 24MCU
 Device #1: Allocating 144MB host-memory
 Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a3.Cayman.64.kernel (220660 bytes)
 Device #2: Allocating 144MB host-memory
 Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a3.Cayman.64.kernel (220660 bytes)
 
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
 
 Status.......: Aborted
 Input.Mode...: Mask (?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1)
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Time.Running.: 8 secs
 Time.Left....: 12 hours, 38 mins
 Time.Util....: 8914.7ms/61.5ms Real/CPU, 0.7% idle
 Speed........:  2230.1M c/s Real,  2239.2M c/s GPU
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 19881000960/101559956668416 (0.02%)
 Rejected.....: 0/19881000960 (0.00%)
 
 Started: Mon Jan 02 20:14:49 2012
 Stopped: Mon Jan 02 20:15:00 2012
 
 Y:\run\oclHashcat-plus>cd ..\oclHashcat
 
 Y:\run\oclHashcat>date 2011-01-02
 
 Y:\run\oclHashcat>oclHashcat64.exe ..\oclHashcat-plus\1.txt ?1?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d
 oclHashcat v0.26 by atom starting...
 
 Digests: 701692 entries, 701692 unique
 Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
 Platform: AMD compatible platform found
 Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled
 Device #1: Cayman, 2048MB, 0Mhz, 24MCU
 Device #2: Cayman, 2048MB, 0Mhz, 24MCU
 NOTE: gpu-accel auto-adjusted to: 80
 Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000.Cayman.64.kernel
 Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000.Cayman.64.kernel
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s
 
 Status.......: Aborted
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Mode.Left....: Mask '?1?1?1?1?1' (60466176)
 Mode.Right...: Mask '?1?1?1?1' (1679616)
 Speed.GPU*...: 3272.6M/s
 Recovered....: 0/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 14155776000/101559956668416 (0.01%)
 Running......: 4 secs
 Estimated....: 8 hours, 37 mins
 
 Started: Sun Jan 02 20:15:36 2011
 Stopped: Sun Jan 02 20:15:43 2011
 
 Y:\run\oclHashcat>date 2012-1-2
 
 Y:\run\oclHashcat>
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,232Threads: 233
 Joined: Apr 2010
 
	
	
		as chort already said, increase the -n value:
 oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80
 
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 18Threads: 6
 Joined: Jan 2011
 
	
	
		 (01-02-2012, 03:53 PM)atom Wrote:  as chort already said, increase the -n value:
 oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80
 
Increasing -n  or --gpu-loops does not help.
 
Below is two 5870.
 Quote:T:\run\oclHashcat-plus>oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80oclHashcat-plus v0.07 by atom starting...
 
 Hashes: 701692
 Unique digests: 701692
 Bitmaps: 21 bits, 1048576 entries, 0x000fffff mask, 4194304 bytes
 GPU-Loops: 128
 GPU-Accel: 80
 Password lengths range: 1 - 15
 Platform: AMD compatible platform found
 Watchdog: Temperature limit disabled
 Device #1: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
 Device #2: Cypress, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 20MCU
 Device #1: Allocating 240MB host-memory
 Device #1: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a3.Cypress.64.kernel (221300 bytes)
 Device #2: Allocating 240MB host-memory
 Device #2: Kernel ./kernels/4098/m0000_a3.Cypress.64.kernel (221300 bytes)
 
 [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => q
 
 Status.......: Aborted
 Input.Mode...: Mask (?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1)
 Hash.Type....: MD5
 Time.Running.: 4 secs
 Time.Left....: 14 hours, 32 mins
 Time.Util....: 4972.4ms/85.6ms Real/CPU, 1.8% idle
 Speed........:  1940.1M c/s Real,  1981.9M c/s GPU
 Recovered....: 1/701692 Digests, 0/1 Salts
 Progress.....: 9646899200/101559956668416 (0.01%)
 Rejected.....: 0/9646899200 (0.00%)
 
 Started: Sun Jan 02 22:49:06 2011
 Stopped: Sun Jan 02 22:49:12 2011
 
 T:\run\oclHashcat-plus>
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 313Threads: 44
 Joined: Aug 2011
 
	
	
		what is the GPU utilization at during the run? 
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 18Threads: 6
 Joined: Jan 2011
 
	
	
		 (01-02-2012, 08:11 PM)forumhero Wrote:  what is the GPU utilization at during the run? 
Gpu usage : 
plus: 97% 98% or 99%. 
oclhashcat 0.26: 94%
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 5,232Threads: 233
 Joined: Apr 2010
 
	
	
		since brute-force has been ported from lite and not from regular oclHashcat, speeds depend a lot on the number of hashes.  
for example, with 2 hashes:
 
plus 0.07: Speed........:  5013.7M c/s Real,  5085.7M c/s GPU 
regular 0.26: Speed.GPU*...: 4035.2M/s
 
with 100 hashes:
 
plus 0.07: Speed........:  4581.0M c/s Real,  4884.6M c/s GPU 
regular 0.26: Speed.GPU*...: 3968.6M/s
 
event horizon is somewhere around 1000 hashes.
 
also, if you take a look at docs/todo.txt it contains this line:
 
- Should use oclHashcat-lite's candidate generator to lower GPU idle times
 
once this has been done, it will again boost a lot in speed    |