looking for affrodable GPU
#1
Hello, I'm new using Hashcat and my setup has an old 560ti that gives arround 24000 H/s. And I'm thinking in getting another GPU that could give more H/s, as Im still trying dont wanna spend to much, and around 100€ would be mi limit.
would be a 7970 a good purchase? I could buy it for around 50, and also have the chance of getting a 6990 for 70.
or is just better to buy something newer?

thanks.
Reply
#2
Buy something newer and buy an nvidia card. If you're on a budget a used 750TI or 960 might be ok.
Reply
#3
(03-17-2019, 12:11 PM)undeath Wrote: Buy something newer and buy an nvidia card. If you're on a budget a used 750TI or 960 might be ok.

Thanks for the reply, based on some GPU Hash benchmarks i see that 7970 provides more H/s than the Nvidia (750ti only 60000) cards that you suggest, could you give me a reason for going for Nvidia instead Radeon?

cheers.
Reply
#4
I don't think AMD 7xxx cards still have opencl support, hence won't work with hashcat. Besides. AMD cards quickly overheat/heat throttle and need much more power.
Reply
#5
I've managed to assemble and run Hashcat 5.1.0 with Windows 10 and 7x AMD Radeon HD 7970 / AMD Radeon R9 280x (generally the same cards) last month.

But yeah, they are kinda hot and power hungry so you might be better off with some Nvidia card.
Reply
#6
Thanks, I've been researching in the forum and I could buy for the same price (60 EUR) a 750ti, a 960 or a 1050. Any suggestion to take the better along those three? 1080 are more than 600 EUR in Spain, the idea is okay around with something cheaper and then in a while but something better off the prices go down.
Reply
#7
750TI is definitely the slowest of the three. Not sure about 960 vs 1050.
Reply
#8
Have also the chance of a 1060 3gb for just a little more, would it be a good candidate? I didn't found real world H/S for the 1060.
Reply
#9
I think the 1060 is definitely your best bet. Here is a benchmark of my GTX 1060 6GB (Driver is currently not uptodate, but it should give you a good idea) :

Code:
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting in benchmark mode...

Benchmarking uses hand-optimized kernel code by default.
You can use it in your cracking session by setting the -O option.
Note: Using optimized kernel code limits the maximum supported password length.
To disable the optimized kernel code in benchmark mode, use the -w option.

* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
            This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
            To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 1536/6144 MB allocatable, 10MCU

Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable

Hashmode: 0 - MD5

Speed.#1.........:  9655.7 MH/s (68.75ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:256 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 100 - SHA1

Speed.#1.........:  3688.0 MH/s (90.32ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:256 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1400 - SHA2-256

Speed.#1.........:  1351.2 MH/s (61.51ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:128 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1700 - SHA2-512

Speed.#1.........:   470.9 MH/s (88.59ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 2500 - WPA-EAPOL-PBKDF2 (Iterations: 4096)

Speed.#1.........:   175.6 kH/s (57.96ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1000 - NTLM

Speed.#1.........: 16901.8 MH/s (78.58ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:512 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 3000 - LM

Speed.#1.........:  9599.9 MH/s (69.40ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:1024 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 5500 - NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv1+ESS

Speed.#1.........:  9692.7 MH/s (68.38ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:256 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 5600 - NetNTLMv2

Speed.#1.........:   753.1 MH/s (55.29ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1500 - descrypt, DES (Unix), Traditional DES

Speed.#1.........:   413.1 MH/s (50.31ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:1024 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 500 - md5crypt, MD5 (Unix), Cisco-IOS $1$ (MD5) (Iterations: 1000)

Speed.#1.........:  4362.7 kH/s (69.37ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:1000 Thr:32 Vec:1

Hashmode: 3200 - bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix) (Iterations: 32)

Speed.#1.........:     7800 H/s (39.82ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:8 Thr:8 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1800 - sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix) (Iterations: 5000)

Speed.#1.........:    64347 H/s (62.78ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:128 Thr:32 Vec:1

Hashmode: 7500 - Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23

Speed.#1.........:   149.8 MH/s (69.63ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 13100 - Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23

Speed.#1.........:   148.7 MH/s (70.14ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 15300 - DPAPI masterkey file v1 (Iterations: 23999)

Speed.#1.........:    30273 H/s (57.32ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 15900 - DPAPI masterkey file v2 (Iterations: 7999)

Speed.#1.........:    21634 H/s (59.68ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:128 Thr:32 Vec:1

Hashmode: 7100 - macOS v10.8+ (PBKDF2-SHA512) (Iterations: 35000)

Speed.#1.........:     5368 H/s (55.40ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:32 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 11600 - 7-Zip (Iterations: 524288)

Speed.#1.........:     4257 H/s (74.59ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:128 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 12500 - RAR3-hp (Iterations: 262144)

Speed.#1.........:    19661 H/s (64.79ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:16384 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 13000 - RAR5 (Iterations: 32767)

Speed.#1.........:    17069 H/s (74.45ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 6211 - TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit (Iterations: 2000)

Speed.#1.........:   114.9 kH/s (77.80ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 13400 - KeePass 1 (AES/Twofish) and KeePass 2 (AES) (Iterations: 6000)

Speed.#1.........:    64510 H/s (105.32ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:256 Thr:32 Vec:1

Hashmode: 6800 - LastPass + LastPass sniffed (Iterations: 500)

Speed.#1.........:  1054.6 kH/s (73.71ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:125 Thr:256 Vec:1

Hashmode: 11300 - Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat (Iterations: 199999)

Speed.#1.........:     1996 H/s (52.22ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:64 Thr:256 Vec:1

Started: Mon Mar 18 19:42:54 2019

                                 
Stopped: Mon Mar 18 19:48:43 2019

Note that the 6GB variant does also have slightly more streaming processors than the 3GB, so the performance will be a bit less.

Might be also interesting for you: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-7765.html
Reply
#10
Thanks a lot, I'll get a 1060 3GB as is a good piece to pay around and learn.
Reply