01-06-2013, 07:12 AM
Interesting. Somehow, I missed that.
Perhaps rephrasing the error's massage would have helped in preventing such misunderstanding. Something like:
Replacing oclHashcat-plus.restore with the binary's default restore file name and 000000 with the actual pid.
And +2 for sessions!
Perhaps rephrasing the error's massage would have helped in preventing such misunderstanding. Something like:
Code:
ERROR: oclHashcat-plus.restore is already in use (pid 000000), please use another session name to run.
And +2 for sessions!