-t option statsprocessor
#8
One question on barboy's example above. Wouldn't be
Code:
sp64.bin --pw-min 8 --pw-max 8 -t26 hashcat.hcstat ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
the same as
Code:
sp64.bin --pw-min 8 --pw-max 8 ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l
in terms of keyspace e.g. both 26^8? Just beeing probabilistically-ordered?

Background of my question ist the new .hcmask feature in oclHashcat-plus 0.15 I am using. I am looping through hcmasks - starting with full masks without -t setting, managable by my GPU/calculated time, then one with added characters in the .hcmask but using -t.

My calculation based on the wiki (http://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=comb...nt_formula)
would be for example (a simplified example/one entry in a .hcmask file) that:
Code:
?l?l?l?l
(26^4 = 456.976)
in .hcmask 1 would be aproximately the same as
Code:
-t 14 ?l?l?l?l?l
(14^5 = 537.824)
in .hcmask2 in terms of keyspace?

Maybe I got something wrong, but I'm not sure...

sorry for my english, hope you get my question


Messages In This Thread
-t option statsprocessor - by barboy - 09-01-2013, 12:08 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by epixoip - 09-01-2013, 12:15 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by barboy - 09-01-2013, 12:19 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by epixoip - 09-01-2013, 12:33 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by barboy - 09-01-2013, 12:52 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by epixoip - 09-01-2013, 12:59 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by barboy - 09-01-2013, 01:30 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by vrposter - 09-01-2013, 03:18 PM
RE: -t option statsprocessor - by epixoip - 09-02-2013, 08:39 AM