oclhashcat vs hashcat
#2
Did you make sure to have no words >= length 32 inside your dictionaries? That's the difference between both programs.

There's also a huge difference between b53 and b57, please try again with b57.

In my local tests I was unable to reproduce. I first tried with my unmodified dictionaries which resulted in the expected result. Hashcat was cracking more than oclHashcat. Then i removed all words >= 32 from my dictionaries and ran hashcat again. It then cracked the same number as oclHashcat.

oclhashcat:
Quote:Recovered......: 5708/1633919 (0.35%) Digests, 0/1 (0.00%) Salts

hashcat before:
Quote:Recovered.: 6665/1633919 hashes, 0/1 salts

hashcat after:
Quote:Recovered.: 5669/1633919 hashes, 0/1 salts

When removing oversized words please use len.exe tool from hashcat-utils because only this program makes sure to count correctly bytewise. For example, other length utilities do count a "ä" as 1 byte only but bytewise it takes 2 byte.


Messages In This Thread
oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 12:08 AM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by atom - 11-26-2013, 11:48 AM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 05:52 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 07:57 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by mastercracker - 11-26-2013, 09:50 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 10:03 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by atom - 11-26-2013, 10:03 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by epixoip - 11-26-2013, 10:10 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 10:12 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by atom - 11-26-2013, 10:15 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by epixoip - 11-26-2013, 10:21 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 10:27 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by atom - 11-26-2013, 10:32 PM
RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat - by proinside - 11-26-2013, 10:35 PM