NTLM hash, how practical is it?
#9
My understanding was that Win Serv 2k8 use v2?

Ok, so that was my first misstake. When I run -m 1000 the mask is set to ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3 and my 8-char test-pwd isn't caught. How can I make sure that ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a is tested? (I know, but I expect the pwd to be 8-12 chars, effectively randomized...)


Messages In This Thread
NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by mido15 - 02-18-2014, 12:56 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by Si2006 - 02-18-2014, 01:11 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-22-2014, 01:34 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by undeath - 02-22-2014, 11:20 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-22-2014, 05:21 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-22-2014, 12:38 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-22-2014, 01:19 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-22-2014, 01:49 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-22-2014, 11:58 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-23-2014, 10:31 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-23-2014, 09:47 PM