NTLM hash, how practical is it?
#11
(02-22-2014, 01:49 PM)ToJ Wrote: When I run -m 1000 the mask is set to ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3 and my 8-char test-pwd isn't caught. How can I make sure that ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a is tested? (I know, but I expect the pwd to be 8-12 chars, effectively randomized...)
Either you did not hash your test password properly or your mask is not matching your password. It's always a good idea to include an hash with a known value to make sure that everything is set properly. Post your command line so that we can understand what is going on.


Messages In This Thread
NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by mido15 - 02-18-2014, 12:56 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by Si2006 - 02-18-2014, 01:11 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-22-2014, 01:34 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by undeath - 02-22-2014, 11:20 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-22-2014, 05:21 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-22-2014, 12:38 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-22-2014, 01:19 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-22-2014, 01:49 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by mastercracker - 02-23-2014, 05:55 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-22-2014, 11:58 PM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by ToJ - 02-23-2014, 10:31 AM
RE: NTLM hash, how practical is it? - by epixoip - 02-23-2014, 09:47 PM