12-27-2015, 12:19 PM
+1 on maxwell. will probably also go the 980 direction, as it's seems to be the tradeoff between performance, power consumption and initial investment.
|
What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 12-22-2015, 07:50 AM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by epixoip - 12-22-2015, 08:21 AM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 12-23-2015, 07:08 AM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 12-24-2015, 06:35 PM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by epixoip - 12-24-2015, 09:36 PM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 12-26-2015, 07:00 AM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by epixoip - 12-26-2015, 09:51 AM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 12-26-2015, 01:20 PM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by epixoip - 12-27-2015, 12:03 AM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 12-27-2015, 12:19 PM
RE: What about R9 Nano? Benchmarks? - by jodler303 - 01-16-2016, 04:54 PM
|