It's possible that hashcat's format is a little different in its conversion, but I'm not sure what the difference might be.
It's also possible that it's a slightly newer version or variant. Do you know what version of Lotus it is? If everything after the colon is a single, uninterrupted string of hex, then it's a 56-byte string, which is pretty close to -m 9100 (Lotus Notes/Domino 8).
Do you have access to the platform itself, such that you could hash a known plaintext (like 'hashcat') and post its unredacted hash for analysis?
It's also possible that it's a slightly newer version or variant. Do you know what version of Lotus it is? If everything after the colon is a single, uninterrupted string of hex, then it's a 56-byte string, which is pretty close to -m 9100 (Lotus Notes/Domino 8).
Do you have access to the platform itself, such that you could hash a known plaintext (like 'hashcat') and post its unredacted hash for analysis?
~