12-17-2020, 01:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-17-2020, 01:43 AM by AlanGomes_.)
(12-17-2020, 01:37 AM)undeath Wrote: Did you only measure that speed with the first mask in your list or also with longer ones? Masks with only few variable chars will always produce low performance.
Alright, I was doing something wrong, I changed to mode 20 without removing the first salt of the mask file.
Now the speed increased from ~123.2 MH/s in mode 0 to ~6126.4 MH/s in mode 20.
Still is a little under the 12940.3 MH/s speed I got in the benchmark. Maybe some optimization I have to do?
My current mask (9999999999 is a placeholder with the same length of the real salt):
Code:
?h,?19999999999
?h,?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?1?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?19999999999
?h,?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?19999999999
I measured the speed with the largest mask.