Okay, thank you very much 
I'm also wondering, if I may, what (if any at all) difference there might be in cracking efficiency/probability between hashes derived (w/ hcxdumptool & hcxpcapngtool) from EAPOL M1M2 challenge ('halfway handshakes') vs M2M3 authorized ('4 way handshake') captures?
In my current test environment I had hcxdumptool set to not send disassociation frames and, therefore, my resulting hashes are largely derived from M1M2 challenge (as well as some PMKID) captures.
So with regard to the thread topic (tactics for WPA cracking) is there any advantage/disadvantage in going for certain kinds of handshake captures over others for cracking efficiency/probability, presupposing the use of hcxdumptool/hcxpcapngtool?
I'm also wondering, if I may, what (if any at all) difference there might be in cracking efficiency/probability between hashes derived (w/ hcxdumptool & hcxpcapngtool) from EAPOL M1M2 challenge ('halfway handshakes') vs M2M3 authorized ('4 way handshake') captures?In my current test environment I had hcxdumptool set to not send disassociation frames and, therefore, my resulting hashes are largely derived from M1M2 challenge (as well as some PMKID) captures.
So with regard to the thread topic (tactics for WPA cracking) is there any advantage/disadvantage in going for certain kinds of handshake captures over others for cracking efficiency/probability, presupposing the use of hcxdumptool/hcxpcapngtool?