oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks
#18
(04-08-2012, 11:34 PM)undeath Wrote:
(04-08-2012, 07:33 PM)kigg Wrote: I think it is like this because the code isn't optimised for the new 28nm cards.

It is, and has always been, because Nvidia cards suck at GPGPU.

[Image: 3ttkC.jpg]

Really? I was going to buy 2 x GTX 680. Would it be better to hit the HD 7970 instead?

I'm particularly interested on md5crypt benchmarks on these two graphic cards but I didn't find any so far.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by atom - 03-30-2012, 09:50 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by M@LIK - 03-30-2012, 10:33 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by atom - 03-30-2012, 11:42 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by M@LIK - 03-30-2012, 11:47 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by kigg - 04-07-2012, 04:53 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by atom - 03-30-2012, 11:42 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by atom - 03-30-2012, 11:43 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by atom - 04-07-2012, 05:16 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by kigg - 04-07-2012, 05:27 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by K9 - 04-08-2012, 03:28 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by kigg - 04-08-2012, 07:33 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by splash_ - 04-25-2012, 04:06 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by K9 - 04-25-2012, 04:28 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite gtx680 benchmarks - by atom - 04-25-2012, 04:50 PM