Comparaison CudaHashcat-plus 0.08 vs 0.07 ... !!!

[hasheponge]

@ALL for users who use cudahashcat-plus, i tested 0.07 and 0.08 with same script... same files and same rule, same GPU !
differents performances ! and the worst not the same result !!!!

Results :

with 0.07 :

Speed........: 612.6M c/s Real, 582.8M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 311/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20132793600/80453034400 (25.02%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20132793600 (21.96%)

with 0.08 :

Speed........: 472.3M c/s Real, 485.6M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 7/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20444744960/80453034400 (25.41%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20444744960 (21.62%)

0.08 -23% !! and curious Recovered !!! 0.07 = 311, 0.08 = 7 !!!

Drivers 296.10
Hashs : MD5 , Rule : d3ad0ne.rule
GPU for this test : GTX 470 , win 7-32bits

... Bug ?

---

I tested with my second GPU (GTS 450) same results... :-(

** on this test same GPU-Loops, GPU-Accel...

@ALL for users who use cudahashcat-plus, i tested 0.07 and 0.08 with same script... same files and same rule, same GPU !
differents performances ! and the worst not the same result !!!!

Results :

with 0.07 :

Speed........: 612.6M c/s Real, 582.8M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 311/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20132793600/80453034400 (25.02%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20132793600 (21.96%)

with 0.08 :

Speed........: 472.3M c/s Real, 485.6M c/s GPU
Recovered....: 7/1441897 Digests, 0/1 Salts
Progress.....: 20444744960/80453034400 (25.41%)
Rejected.....: 4420537600/20444744960 (21.62%)

0.08 -23% !! and curious Recovered !!! 0.07 = 311, 0.08 = 7 !!!

Drivers 296.10
Hashs : MD5 , Rule : d3ad0ne.rule
GPU for this test : GTX 470 , win 7-32bits

... Bug ?