Hashes that don't work well with --remove
#5
(11-05-2024, 01:55 AM)Chick3nman Wrote: Ahhh, this is for the special file format handling for NT:LM and shadow files. If you want to avoid that issue, you need to load the hashes in their raw format, so just the NT hash alone, or LM hash alone. Only NT, LM, and a few of the crypt(3) hashes are capable of alternative file formats like that. Specifically meant to allow loading of pwdump and shadow file formats. This is a convenience feature but I would suggest simply parsing the hashes into their individual formats instead to avoid behavior like this.

That is what I was figuring. Do you know of a list of hashes that have different formats that don't work well with --remove?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Hashes that don't work well with --remove - by ZerkerEOD - 11-06-2024, 12:46 AM