cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ?
#12
oclHashcat-lite does not have wpa2 support, but the example looks like it worked just fine. When could we expect gtx 6xx support for oclHashcat-plus?

Code:
root@bt:~/oclHashcat-lite-0.10# ./cudaExample.sh cudaHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting... Password lengths range: 1 - 55 Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c Device #1: GeForce GTX 680, 2047MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU Device #2: GeForce GTX 680, 2047MB, 705Mhz, 8MCU [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s Status.......: Running Hash.Target..: 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe Hash.Type....: MD5 Time.Running.: 0 secs Time.Left....: 29 secs Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2 Plain.Text...: ***atte Plain.Length.: 7 Progress.....: 1509949440/134960504832 (1.12%) Speed.GPU.#1.: 2247.7M/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 2239.8M/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 4487.5M/s HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 69c Temp, 41% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 68c Temp, 40% Fan [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s Status.......: Running Hash.Target..: 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe Hash.Type....: MD5 Time.Running.: 15 secs Time.Left....: 14 secs Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2 Plain.Text...: ***0dhb Plain.Length.: 7 Progress.....: 71156367360/134960504832 (52.72%) Speed.GPU.#1.: 2224.0M/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 2228.9M/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 4452.9M/s HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 72c Temp, 45% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 71c Temp, 44% Fan [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit => s Status.......: Running Hash.Target..: 9b957cc6ab97cbf88c4f6f0f146adafe Hash.Type....: MD5 Time.Running.: 10 mins, 10 secs Time.Left....: 10 mins, 31 secs Plain.Mask...: ?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3 Plain.Text...: ***y5ce0 Plain.Length.: 8 Progress.....: 2720016629760/5533380698112 (49.16%) Speed.GPU.#1.: 2225.8M/s Speed.GPU.#2.: 2228.0M/s Speed.GPU.#*.: 4453.8M/s HWMon.GPU.#1.: -1% Util, 79c Temp, 56% Fan HWMon.GPU.#2.: -1% Util, 77c Temp, 54% Fan [s]tatus [p]ause [r]esume [q]uit =>


Messages In This Thread
cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 05:11 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by D3ad0ne - 08-21-2012, 05:13 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 05:16 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by Mem5 - 08-21-2012, 07:44 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 09:04 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-21-2012, 10:30 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 11:00 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by radix - 08-21-2012, 11:19 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-21-2012, 11:25 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by bob - 08-22-2012, 12:02 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-22-2012, 09:50 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-23-2012, 11:32 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by bob - 08-22-2012, 06:11 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-22-2012, 07:12 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-23-2012, 01:27 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by bob - 08-23-2012, 05:55 PM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by mtr0ll - 08-24-2012, 04:38 AM
RE: cudaHashcat-plus 0 c/s ? - by atom - 08-24-2012, 02:20 PM