oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1
#24
Fantastic! Thanks to you!

atom Wrote: That is because all input into oclHashcat-plus for mode -m 131 (and -m 3000 and -m 3100 as well) is converted into uppercase because these systems do not support passwords in lower case. Why should oclHashcat-plus try them? Maybe your hash generator did generate hashes based on lowercase input, which is wrong.
Ah, I see. Looks like I need to fix some bugs myself. Thanks for the info!

atom Wrote: Thats right, I agree, but its not easy to fix. In theory this would require to keep a copy of the original string to each salt which would increase the required memory again. Additionally, the salt structure for the host and gpu are the same, so this data would be required to be copied to the GPU as well even its totally useless on there. So yeah, it would work but its a lot of effort. Is that really required? I dont think so.
Yea, I can imagine all this. And no, it's not that important.

Reporting back:
- Great! --outfile-format=4 works fine now.
- Masks are working like a charm. -i switch is lovely too, will use that some day.
-m131: Working flawlessly after generating correct hashes. (Sorry!)
- -m3000: Finally! -a1, -a6 and -a7 are no longer giving wrong cracks, hopefully. BUT It annoys me that -a0 still does NOT crack 6_len passes. (EXCEPT with echo -n)
- .\docs\user_manuals.txt, line_3: "currently oudated" ou... What? xD


Messages In This Thread
oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-04-2012, 08:09 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by blandyuk - 09-04-2012, 08:37 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by blandyuk - 09-04-2012, 09:03 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-04-2012, 09:42 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by kartan - 09-04-2012, 09:16 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-05-2012, 10:22 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by forumhero - 09-05-2012, 12:02 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-05-2012, 10:26 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-05-2012, 07:45 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by blandyuk - 09-05-2012, 12:03 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-05-2012, 10:23 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by M@LIK - 09-05-2012, 12:37 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-05-2012, 10:26 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by mastercracker - 09-05-2012, 07:09 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-05-2012, 07:43 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by KT819GM - 09-05-2012, 08:41 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by forumhero - 09-05-2012, 10:33 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by M@LIK - 09-06-2012, 02:39 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-06-2012, 11:28 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by blandyuk - 09-06-2012, 09:45 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by M@LIK - 09-06-2012, 09:54 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by blandyuk - 09-06-2012, 09:58 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-06-2012, 11:36 AM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by M@LIK - 09-06-2012, 12:11 PM
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 RC1 - by atom - 09-07-2012, 05:32 PM