oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
#2
good input.

the first one might be a bug, but i can not reproduce it. can you give me some commandline examples please?

2nd one might be because oclhashcat works a lot different internal with its memory handling in rules than hashcat. for example oclhashcat-plus does have only a 16 byte temporary buffer and does not skip once a not matching rule is applied. for example, if the input word has the length 9 and you use the double rule it gets length 18 last 2 byte not are missing in oclhashcat. in hashcat that would not happend. now if another rule is aplied that would remove lets say the first 4 characters, then the length becomes length 15 so its "ok", however, in oclhashcat the 2 byte got missing ffrom the first so the length in oclhashcat-plus will be length 11 Smile

about the changes in 0.45 its strange i see something:


type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: dropped predefined charsets ?h, ?F, ?G and ?R
trac: #55

type: feature
file: hashcat-cli
desc: added a collection of language-specific charset-files for use with masks
trac: #55

type: bug
file: hashcat-cli
desc: fixed a null-pointer dereference that can lead to a segmentation fault
trac: #104


Messages In This Thread
RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1 - by atom - 03-31-2013, 12:34 PM