Cracking SHA1(linkedin)
#10
I don't know about it's official bug/feature status, but I can say that with all remaining bits being identical, the likelihood of any given hash being anything other than an accidental or deliberate alteration of the "true" hash is very low. One could argue that it probably shouldn't be -m 100, though, and instead its own mode.
~
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by whabikhazri - 08-10-2020, 05:41 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by royce - 08-10-2020, 05:45 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by whabikhazri - 08-10-2020, 07:05 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by philsmd - 08-10-2020, 07:07 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by royce - 08-10-2020, 08:45 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by whabikhazri - 08-11-2020, 01:43 AM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by philsmd - 08-11-2020, 09:57 AM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by whabikhazri - 08-11-2020, 05:25 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by mailmuncher2000 - 02-13-2021, 11:21 AM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by royce - 02-13-2021, 06:22 PM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by mailmuncher2000 - 02-14-2021, 01:06 AM
RE: Cracking SHA1(linkedin) - by mailmuncher2000 - 02-14-2021, 07:46 AM