oclHashcat-lite v0.09
#4
Thanks atom !

I am not agree with you mastercracker, if you have a long list of 32-chars hashes you obviously do not want to split all hashes in 2. Also, for found hashes it better to have the entire LM hash:plain : otherwise how can we know which part of the hash has been cracked when you have thousands of hashes ?..


Messages In This Thread
oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by atom - 02-04-2012, 12:05 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by chort - 02-04-2012, 12:12 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 06:56 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by Mem5 - 02-04-2012, 11:41 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 09:15 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by atom - 02-04-2012, 09:20 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 09:22 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by Mem5 - 02-05-2012, 11:14 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 06-16-2012, 06:04 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 06-16-2012, 06:52 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 06-16-2012, 09:50 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by nimanima - 07-11-2012, 05:06 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 07-11-2012, 05:09 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 08-22-2012, 10:45 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 08-23-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 08-23-2012, 10:35 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 08-23-2012, 12:24 PM