oclHashcat-lite v0.09
#5
(02-04-2012, 11:41 AM)Mem5 Wrote: otherwise how can we know which part of the hash has been cracked when you have thousands of hashes ?..
There are multiple ways that it can be represented. One example could be like this:

1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef:<NOT CRAKCKED> DMIN1

or

1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef:1SUPERA <NOT CRACKED>

Also, maybe not for you but when you try to help other people, they sometime make a typo in their hash. By having at least a part of the password allows you to know that the hash has been properly extracted (and not syskeyed) and guess what the other part could be. Don't get me wrong, I am not against a hash in one piece, I just state some drawbacks.



Messages In This Thread
oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by atom - 02-04-2012, 12:05 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by chort - 02-04-2012, 12:12 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 06:56 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by Mem5 - 02-04-2012, 11:41 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 09:15 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by atom - 02-04-2012, 09:20 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 09:22 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by Mem5 - 02-05-2012, 11:14 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 06-16-2012, 06:04 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 06-16-2012, 06:52 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 06-16-2012, 09:50 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by nimanima - 07-11-2012, 05:06 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 07-11-2012, 05:09 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 08-22-2012, 10:45 PM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 08-23-2012, 01:42 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by bobili - 08-23-2012, 10:35 AM
RE: oclHashcat-lite v0.09 - by KT819GM - 08-23-2012, 12:24 PM